from Hacker News

Germany outfitted half a million balconies with solar panels

by bilsbie on 10/5/25, 10:18 PM with 627 comments

  • by jillesvangurp on 10/6/25, 6:44 AM

    Germany did one simple thing (uncharacteristically) which is removing all the bureaucracy here. Just go ahead and do it. It's fine.

    Cost in the article is cited at 550 euro. I just browsed amazon.de and you can buy complete plug and play kits here in Germany for as little as 239 euro. Most kits are priced between 300-350 euro. I did not see a many kits over 500.

    I pay about 70 euro per month for electricity. If it saves 10% per month on my bill (7 euro), this would earn itself back within 3 years. At 5% it's 6 years. Not bad for something that costs next to nothing and is pretty much plug and play. You are not going to get very rich from this obviously. But it's kind of cool. Too bad my balcony faces east and is mostly covered by the shadow of other buildings. I can barely grow plants there.

  • by melasadra on 10/6/25, 12:05 AM

    Some people laugh at the 800W output. However, in Indonesia, roughly half of the 300 million people live in homes with an electricity capacity of 900W or less.

    Wish these kind of panels were available at that price here. We have pretty much 12 hours of sunlight every single day but household solar panel is discouraged by the state owned utilities.

  • by holri on 10/6/25, 4:56 AM

    I have cut my warm water costs by 80% with balcony solar panels. I have a warm water heating pump with 600 W electrical power. My little server turns it automatically on when the solar access power is greater than 540 W (measured by the smart meter). This generates usually enough warm water for our household. Also the solar panels cover to idle power of the house of 50-100 W very easily during daytime. This pays off in a few years and it reduces my carbon footprint and that of my neighbors.
  • by numlock86 on 10/6/25, 6:33 AM

    > Germany outfitted half a million balconies with solar panels

    A more fitting title would be "Germany's citizens outfitted half a million balconies with solar panels". The current phrasing makes it sound like it's somehow a thing done by the government, which is not the case. If anything the government is one of the many forces slowing down this progress. And yes, I am aware of things like grid security and stability being a concern. I am not complaining.

  • by paulmist on 10/6/25, 12:34 AM

    Meanwhile China projected to add ~300GW of solar capacity in 2025. Germany renewables capacity for 2023 was 165GW.

    https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/climate-energy/chinas...

  • by WaitWaitWha on 10/5/25, 11:51 PM

    Great idea! Want to learn more on the safety though...

    > Once in place, people simply plug a micro-inverter into an available wall outlet.

    later

    >Gründinger and experts at the German Solar Industry Association noted that the devices don’t generate enough power to strain the grid, and their standardized design and safety features allow them to integrate into balconies smoothly and easily.

    This seem to talk to the safety of the grid and the balcony. What is done when electricians power down the apartment or worse, the building to work on something? The wires remain energized despite proper distribution panel shut down. Do these setups have auto shut off if they see no other power on the plug they are on? what if it is the building, wouldn't other panels still energize the wires, so they would not shut down? Just asking, as my personal experience is quite hair raising and crispy when it comes to inappropriately de-energized circuits. ;)

  • by syntaxing on 10/6/25, 12:49 AM

    AP News had a great article about this. We really need more states to adopt this beyond Utah.

    https://apnews.com/article/balcony-plug-solar-climate-energy...

  • by bickfordb on 10/6/25, 12:28 AM

    I was pricing out using bifacial panels for fencing. It seems like it would cost about twice the price of cedar, but last twice as long (50 years) and have less upkeep.
  • by alexey-salmin on 10/6/25, 6:43 AM

    It's like the backyard furnaces during the Great Leap Forward.

    Production of electricity like production of steel makes most economical sense at scale. When the economic policy fails so hard it has to resort to backyard anything you know where it's going.

  • by tecleandor on 10/6/25, 12:53 AM

    > German regulations limit balcony solar systems to 800 watts, enough to power a small fridge or charge a laptop.

    That gotta be a big laptop!

  • by Tepix on 10/6/25, 10:57 AM

    Decentralisation is the way to go for energy. Instead of having huge powerplants and fat power lines having a large percentage of the needed energy produced locally is ideal.

    Nowadays, having some solar and a battery is very affordable and means you don't need power from the grid perhaps 80% of the time. And with batteries soon getting a lot cheaper ( https://www.geeky-gadgets.com/catl-sodium-ion-battery-packs/ ) and photovoltaics continuing their price trajectory, soon most alternatives will be unattractive, in particular nuclear.

  • by ZeroGravitas on 10/6/25, 9:42 AM

    This is the next step to people realising that building the walls of buildings from PV panels makes sense.
  • by nebula8804 on 10/6/25, 2:13 AM

    Has anyone done any studies on the co2 emission of manufacturing one panel like this? Curious how long it will take to offset.
  • by asdefghyk on 10/6/25, 4:11 AM

    Maybe a most important benefit is it makes people MORE aware of their actual daily electricity consumption ...?
  • by tdiff on 10/8/25, 8:38 PM

    Beginning with

    > “Even if we attached panels to all suitable balconies across the country, we’d still only manage to meet 1 percent or less of our overall energy needs,”

    the article concludes that the most prominent effect of balcony panels is of psychological nature.

    At best it pays out in 5 years. Our landlord, for example, requires the panel to be installed by certified professionals, hence it will take even longer to break even, even assuming the device will not malfunction during the time, which I am sceptical about, especially when talking about the cheapest sets from amazon/kaufland.

  • by vintagedave on 10/6/25, 8:14 AM

    > [The solar panels are] connected to a microinverter plugged into a wall outlet and feed electricity directly into his home.

    Is this safe, feeding electricity into the local cabling? I recall a discussion on HN a few days ago with someone running a parallel cabling setup and there was _strong_ criticism over electrical safety; that was an entirely parallel set of cabling.

    How would this work re phase, load, how it balances re the mains input, if it goes through the fuse box, etc?

  • by squarefoot on 10/6/25, 6:13 AM

    What is the real throughput of panels mounted vertically? I have put solar on my roof plus batteries and it reduced significantly my dependence on gas and cost of heating bills, but they're mounted on two sides so they see the sun from early-mid morning to mid afternoon, with peaks roughly mid day depending on season. I've always been skeptical about vertically mounted ones but people say they work, so not sure what to think.
  • by rmoriz on 10/6/25, 12:21 AM

    Besides the physical and ecological aspects, this is very libertarian. Something that is sadly not very appreciated in Germany. People take responsibilities, consider low power devices and optimize running times of dishwashers etc. to maximize ROI. Many new home automation (HA) users do exactly this. It's a reason to discover a new field of skills, like setting up home labs to increase digital sovereignty (partially) for example with HA and Nextcloud. Advanced users will go further and become familiar with Proxmox VE and even a container setup. Plenty of off-lease PCs are currently flooding the market (Thanks, Windows 11 requirements) making them awesome Linux/Proxmox hosts.
  • by renewiltord on 10/6/25, 12:39 AM

    This is cool. One annoying thing with much of San Francisco is that renting means you can't put things on the outside of the building usually (not a law just common lease language) but I have a little solar panel that I use to charge a phone that I can leave outside. This is wonderful. Power from the sun and no consumables!
  • by infecto on 10/6/25, 12:44 PM

    I hope the US can have more of this. I never thought solar on most resi roofs made any sense. The cost is high, lots of risk from leaks but building a patio with a pergola or other shaded structure? Sign me up. The Us should be fighting to lower the red tape to get these kind of systems in place.
  • by maelito on 10/6/25, 1:12 PM

    I wouldn't do this in my place. Having a balcony already makes your interior less bright and "closed". Blocking sunlight (even compared to semi-opaque balustrades) would make it worse, for a final energy gain that is quite small compared to central electricity production.
  • by petesergeant on 10/6/25, 5:27 AM

    > “Even if we attached panels to all suitable balconies across the country, we’d still only manage to meet 1 percent or less of our overall energy needs”

    That's a shame, and makes the whole thing feel performative, especially for a country that nixed nuclear.

  • by pembrook on 10/6/25, 10:40 AM

    It's clear that hackernews is a DIY crowd and loves this idea. I'm pro letting people do whatever they want and whatever makes them feel good.

    HOWEVER, I have to point out how incredibly silly this is. There is a reason why historically we have pooled our resources under the government to produce and manage energy infrastructure centrally.

    Let's say these 500,000 individuals instead pooled their 1,000 euro (including installation & time) and funded one industrial-scale solar development.

    You could generate a renewable 600MW+ (a 4X factor on what these randomly placed individual units will ever deliver in reality) for that money. And efficient centralized battery storage also becomes an option there.

    Then your fellow citizens can spend time creating surplus value in the field they are actually experts in and also you don't have a 3rd world hellscape of outdated balcony solar units to look at out your window for the next 30 years.

  • by owenversteeg on 10/6/25, 11:26 AM

    There's a funny comment downthread that says "It's like the backyard furnaces during the Great Leap Forward."

    Everyone replying disagrees, but I think it's a perfect analogy: just like the backyard furnaces, these small-scale installations are inefficient, provide a negligible portion of total energy needs (<1% of total energy needs if everyone in Germany did it, from TFA), look ugly and - this is the most important - provide the feeling of doing something about a serious problem without actually doing anything substantial.

  • by pfdietz on 10/6/25, 1:04 AM

    As batteries and PV panels get cheaper, we'll see demand destruction from this sort of thing. It's going to be a bleeding wound on the grid.
  • by silexia on 10/7/25, 1:43 PM

    Such a stupid government policy. The panels would be far more efficient on the roof of the complex.
  • by JamesAdir on 10/6/25, 9:52 AM

    The energy savings are great, but it makes buildings super ugly. Why not putting them on roofs?
  • by rsanek on 10/6/25, 5:25 AM

    should have a (2024) label
  • by e2e4 on 10/6/25, 9:09 AM

    related recent discussion on YC about DIY solar: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45476820
  • by aszantu on 10/6/25, 6:00 AM

    Balcony solar is limited to 700-800 watt for safety reasons. There's also a lobby to get ppl to need an electrician for installation, which is bullshit. Rising energy prices (I paid minimum 50 bucks/Month) and sneaky corporate tactics (they give you 12 ct/kwh then after like half a year make it 60 ct/kwh) makes ppl want more price independence, which is understandable
  • by MagicMoonlight on 10/6/25, 9:09 PM

    Aren’t these the ones where you plug a live wire directly into the wall socket, with zero hardware to prevent surges or fires?

    Not sure it’s a good idea really

  • by plantain on 10/6/25, 1:15 AM

    This is such a total failure of state capacity.

    Why can the government or industry not build solar power at an industrial scale, and then bring it to people's homes via the existing infrastructure at a price that makes this kind of micro-scale setup completely uneconomical?

    It's bad enough when we have to put solar panels on actual roofs to reduce electricity bills. This is just absurd. Where are the economies of scale? Why are individuals having to take responsibility for their own energy generation? Are we doing our own sewer and water supplies next?

  • by thiago_fm on 10/6/25, 5:44 AM

    I wonder if the solar panels could be tailored themselves to be a balcony, but with a rather distinct look. That would be a massive win.

    I bet some people wouldn't install it now because it looks kinda meh.

  • by lnsru on 10/6/25, 6:26 AM

    That’s the thing about statistics - it is only somehow valid at some uncertain date. I know 3 not registered installations. One guy has big photovoltaic installation and installed balcony power plant to cover his special energy needs at sunrise. Another guy works from home and has two balcony power plants to cover his home office needs. Third guy didn’t like batshit crazy registration website and left the installation unregistered, but running.
  • by fcpk on 10/6/25, 1:23 PM

    This highlights a sad fact: renting is becoming the new long term standard for the younger generations. The buying market is out of reach to 95+% of the population, and so people resort to small hacks like this rather than install full solar sets. Meanwhile landowners and real estate funds are getting richer and laughing at them. Totally dystopian.
  • by monkeydust on 10/5/25, 11:28 PM

    Very solarpunk
  • by nisten69 on 10/6/25, 4:36 AM

    This would be very cute if it was some 3rd world island country grasping at the straws to improve their quality of life...doing this.

    But you're fucking Germany bro....where's your massproduced precision reactors and turbines everywhere..the planet needs work...what the f.. are you guys even doing..a rising standard of living means 10-100x more energy you know that right?

    This whole attitude feels like clapping for a new garden tomato in the middle of a famine... go put some fucking tractors on the field lol but like seriously though.

  • by m101 on 10/6/25, 7:05 AM

    No regard for aesthetics of buildings for pitiful power generation. The German state has completely failed to provide users with cheap electricity and it continues to miss-step with incentivising this nonsense. Shame on them.
  • by wileydragonfly on 10/6/25, 1:05 AM

    Just 5.5 more million to go! And then another 65 million.
  • by duxup on 10/5/25, 11:49 PM

    I wonder how useful those are just small panels hanging off the side of a balcony oriented poorly.

    They also kinda look terrible :(

  • by tomhow on 10/5/25, 11:47 PM

    Redirected from https://cleantechnica.com/2024/12/21/germany-embraces-balkon..., which points to this.

    (And a reminder that the guidelines ask "Please submit the original source. If a post reports on something found on another site, submit the latter".)

  • by pyrale on 10/6/25, 7:11 AM

    Possibly one of the worst possible investment choices From a collective point of view when it comes to electricity.

    One has to question how this choice came to make sense to the german public.

  • by somedude895 on 10/6/25, 8:08 AM

    It's fitting that solar installations are also very popular in third world countries where the government can't provide reliable / affordable power to their citizens. Godspeed, Germany.
  • by lm28469 on 10/5/25, 11:15 PM

    I'm in Germany and keep seeing these, I always wonder what a 400w poorly oriented panel getting like 3 hours of sun a day is good for. If they weren't basically free thanks to tax reduction and other tricks I assume no one would get them