by cowboyscott on 10/23/25, 3:41 PM with 1096 comments
by scrlk on 10/23/25, 3:45 PM
by Havoc on 10/23/25, 6:44 PM
by kbd on 10/23/25, 8:56 PM
by noisy_boy on 10/24/25, 12:51 AM
by hshdhdhehd on 10/23/25, 9:19 PM
Rich drug dealers: Freedom.
Be a rich drug dealer.
by yalogin on 10/24/25, 12:27 AM
by dredmorbius on 10/23/25, 5:17 PM
QZ: <https://qz.com/trump-pardon-binance-changpeng-zhao>
Reuters: <https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-pardons-convicted-bin...>
The Guardian: <https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/oct/23/binance-t...>
by MrToadMan on 10/23/25, 11:05 PM
by ajdlinux on 10/24/25, 1:36 AM
It is a power used very sparingly, even though legally it is unlimited - the state of New South Wales is, as far as I know, the only one which publishes details about uses of the pardon power; in an average year there are 0 successful pardon/commutation applicants, and it's an exceptionally merciful year if they grant 2 or more. Other states and the federal government may or may not be a bit more generous, but we're talking very small numbers. Most pardons are for reasons of unsafe convictions where for whatever reason no remaining avenues of appeal are available (rare, these days, because each state has introduced laws to enable post-conviction reviews).
Historically, particularly in the 19th century convict era, the pardon power was much more important, and was indeed abused for political reasons on a number of occasions, but it seems that for the most part it quietly exists in the background and only gets significant public attention once every blue moon for a high-profile murder case or similar.
What explains the difference? Is it the requirement for sign-off by the King's viceroys that prevents abuse? Collective Cabinet governance that is accountable to Parliament? Maybe our political culture means politicians' friends tend to end up in prison less often and thus there's less opportunity for the abuse of pardons specifically? It's not particularly clear to me - if anyone's got some good comparative studies send me links!
by koolba on 10/23/25, 4:12 PM
Did he already pay the $4.3 billion? That's a lot of money, even for the federal government.
by dreamcompiler on 10/23/25, 8:16 PM
by BLKNSLVR on 10/24/25, 12:23 AM
by wnevets on 10/23/25, 9:14 PM
by Ankaios on 10/24/25, 1:19 AM
by jmspring on 10/23/25, 9:24 PM
by stunt on 10/24/25, 1:47 PM
Market manipulation has been the norm for many years because nobody did anything to stop it.
Pardoning criminals is becoming the new normal. Next normal is going to be launching wars to distract public and is going to cost a lot of lives.
by perihelions on 10/23/25, 5:31 PM
> "Since Trump’s election, Binance has also been a key supporter of his family’s World Liberty Financial crypto venture, a business that has driven a huge leap in the president’s personal wealth."
"Huge leap" meaning $5 billion,
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-wlfi-world-liberty-financ... ("New crypto token boosts Trump family's wealth by $5 billion")
by Bombthecat on 10/24/25, 2:19 PM
Idiots... They see as a positive thing or just ignore it
by taylodl on 10/23/25, 3:52 PM
by miohtama on 10/23/25, 9:19 PM
CZ was pardoned for a single charge of failure to have an effective compliance program. No fraud, no victims, no criminal history. No money laundering.
CZ is the first and only known first-time offender in U.S. history to receive a prison sentence for this single, non-fraud-related charge. The judge found no evidence that he knew of any illicit transactions and that it was reasonable for him to believe there were no illicit funds on the platform.
Trump is a very twisted person, and this makes the US look bad, but the underlying crime was "compliance."
by 1970-01-01 on 10/23/25, 9:37 PM
Bad news: They are getting the kickback money.
by LunaSea on 10/23/25, 10:06 PM
by skm12 on 10/23/25, 4:59 PM
- Trump’s most recent financial disclosure report reveals he made more than $57 million last year from World Liberty Financial
by insane_dreamer on 10/23/25, 4:30 PM
Years ago people would have thought you were talking about the DRC, Haiti or Uzbekistan. Today's it's the USA.
by ghtbircshotbe on 10/24/25, 12:59 PM
by martythemaniak on 10/23/25, 9:01 PM
TRUMP: Which one was that?
COLLINS: The founder of Binance
TRUMP: I believe we're talking about the same person, because I do pardon a lot of people. I don't know. He was recommended by a lot of people.
by fallinghawks on 10/23/25, 8:24 PM
by rts_cts on 10/23/25, 9:16 PM
by Animats on 10/23/25, 8:07 PM
"The Foreign Emoluments Clause bars the president and other federal officials from accepting “any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State” without the consent of Congress. It reflects the framers’ desire to prevent federal officials from succumbing to foreign influence.
The Domestic Emoluments Clause provides for the president to receive a fixed salary and bars him from receiving “any other Emolument from the United States, or any of them.” It was designed to insulate the president against undo pressure from Congress or any individual state."
[1] https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/emol...
by dcchambers on 10/23/25, 8:40 PM
by cedws on 10/23/25, 5:07 PM
by usisdoomed on 10/24/25, 1:53 AM
by b3ing on 10/23/25, 5:33 PM
by hmate9 on 10/23/25, 10:17 PM
by ExpertAdvisor01 on 10/24/25, 5:32 AM
by thr0waway001 on 10/24/25, 3:23 PM
by hedayet on 10/24/25, 8:52 AM
How is this not outright corruption?
by Tade0 on 10/24/25, 7:19 AM
In any case it appears that not only funds are safu, but Zhao is safu as well.
by sleepybrett on 10/23/25, 8:17 PM
by flipfluck on 10/23/25, 9:12 PM
by pulisse on 10/23/25, 4:06 PM
by doener on 10/23/25, 8:17 PM
You Americans elected a mobster as President.
by bryanlarsen on 10/23/25, 7:14 PM
by WheatMillington on 10/23/25, 8:36 PM
by netfortius on 10/23/25, 9:27 PM
by refurb on 10/24/25, 3:27 AM
So the pardon only removes the criminal conviction?
It has zero impact on the time he served.
This doesn’t seemed like the outrageous situation from reading comments.
by burnt-resistor on 10/24/25, 3:26 AM
by W0lfEagle on 10/23/25, 10:31 PM
by insane_dreamer on 10/23/25, 10:44 PM
by locallost on 10/23/25, 10:20 PM
by LightBug1 on 10/23/25, 8:51 PM
/$
by moneycantbuy on 10/23/25, 11:55 PM
by keernan on 10/23/25, 4:14 PM
by bdavisx on 10/23/25, 4:43 PM
What actions that have been taken could actually be prosecuted? For example, I would have to assume that the ballroom demolition and build-out is illegal, there were $0 appropriated from Congress for this, and it doesn't seem like direct donations would be legal either. They are donations to the government and Congress has to appropriate that money too.
NOTHING is going to happen while the Republicans control congress, period. What could be done when the next administration comes in? Not just about the ballroom, but the various other things like this pardon. What of these actions are prosecutable?
by kevin_thibedeau on 10/23/25, 10:35 PM
by deadbabe on 10/23/25, 10:52 PM
by metalliqaz on 10/23/25, 6:30 PM
by fogzen on 10/23/25, 9:50 PM
by mmayberry on 10/23/25, 3:51 PM
by nextworddev on 10/23/25, 9:27 PM
by LatteLazy on 10/23/25, 11:35 PM
I don’t like trump. But “CZ” basically paid a ransom to let Binance come in from the cold. Why shouldn’t he pay another to get a clean slate and maybe go back to being CEO?
by more_corn on 10/23/25, 6:53 PM
by casey2 on 10/23/25, 11:30 PM
by khazhoux on 10/24/25, 1:27 AM
If one wanted to get in on the Trump grift, and had no moral qualms, how would you do it?
Can you come up with a realistic fast path to snag, say, $5 million within 2 years from Trumpland?
by a_ba on 10/23/25, 7:27 PM
by IshKebab on 10/23/25, 8:42 PM
by Alifatisk on 10/23/25, 8:46 PM
The message is clear from his circus administration, you can do anything as long as you bribe them
by tartuffe78 on 10/23/25, 5:51 PM
May I never live to see such a thing happen in the US, but it doesn't feel unlikely.
by JumpinJack_Cash on 10/23/25, 9:00 PM
another part is thankful that he is there as a proof that you can get to a high status and high relevance role in society and still mantain your humanity, your inner child alive, not being robotic and just have a blast doing whatever the f you want.
There is no point getting to the top if you then lose all your humanity and playfulness.
Like if the condition to become President were to become a robot like Hillary Clinton or Joe Biden, thanks no, I pass....Trump on the other hand is the best of both worlds.
by daveguy on 10/23/25, 8:36 PM
by carnufex on 10/23/25, 8:52 PM
by dmitrygr on 10/23/25, 10:29 PM
President Count
--------------------------------
Joe Biden ~8,064 |
Donald Trump ~237 |
Barack Obama ~1,927 |
George W. Bush ~200 |
Bill Clinton ~459 |
George H.W. Bush ~77 |by seany on 10/23/25, 8:42 PM
by sleepybrett on 10/23/25, 8:22 PM
Serious controls need to be placed around the pardon power.
by pwlm on 10/23/25, 9:49 PM
I truly want to know of a better way to have discussions on a topic of this importance.
by seydor on 10/23/25, 8:49 PM
He served 4 months for a laundering case , and has built the most successful exchange. There are bankers and vcs doing far worse things. He deserved the pardon , and no, he doesn't control bitcoin
by annexrichmond on 10/23/25, 11:56 PM
Instead of just commenting about being dismayed with the state of things, how about step back and speculate as to why he did this pardon, and what the implications of it are.
I don't know the answer to either, but I surely didn't learn much from what used to be an insightful, intelligent crowd